Michael, * Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com) wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 5:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfr...@snowman.net> wrote: > > What we need to be doing here is combining the set of components that > > the sequence has been marked with and the set of components that the > > table has been marked with, not trying to figure out if the sequence is > > a member of an extension or not and changing what to do in those cases, > > that's checkExtensionMembership()'s job, really. > > OK, thanks for the confirmation. I have been playing a bit with your > patch and it is correctly dumping ACLs and policies that are modified > after creating an extension. So that looks good to me. > > > Attached is a patch implementing this and which passes the regression > > tests you added and a couple that I added for the non-extension case. > > I'm going to look at adding a few more regression tests and if I don't > > come across any issues then I'll likely push the fix sometime tomorrow. > > + * table will be equivilantly marked. > s/equivilantly/equivalently/. > > By the way, I noticed 3 places in dumpProcLang and 1 place in > dumpSequence where dobj.dump is used in a test but it is not directly > compared with DUMP_COMPONENT_NONE. Perhaps you'd want to change that > as well..
Thanks again for the help on this item, I've pushed the fix and updated the open items wiki. Stephen
Description: Digital signature