On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 6/19/16 10:00 PM, Robert Haas wrote: >>> Independent of that, it would help testing things like this if we allowed >>> > setting max_worker_processes to 0, instead of the current minimum 1. If >>> > there a reason for the minimum of 1? >> I believe that's pure brain fade on my part. I think the minimum should be >> 0. > > Fixed.
Thank you. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
