On 3 August 2016 at 05:14, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> In short, I think Uber's position that logical replication is somehow more
> reliable than physical is just wishful thinking. If anything, my money
> would be on the other way around: there's a lot less mechanism that can go
> wrong in physical replication.
Particularly since they aren't using row-based logical replication, but -
it seems - statement based replication. We all know the problems there.
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services