On 3 August 2016 at 05:14, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> In short, I think Uber's position that logical replication is somehow more
> reliable than physical is just wishful thinking.  If anything, my money
> would be on the other way around: there's a lot less mechanism that can go
> wrong in physical replication.

Particularly since they aren't using row-based logical replication, but -
it seems - statement based replication. We all know the problems there.

 Craig Ringer                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Reply via email to