On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:13 PM, Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 9 August 2016 at 15:59, Masahiko Sawada <sawada.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> The logical replication launcher process and the apply process are >> implemented as a bgworker. Isn't better to have them as an auxiliary >> process like checkpointer, wal writer? > > I don't think so. The checkpointer, walwriter, autovacuum, etc predate > bgworkers. I strongly suspect that if they were to be implemented now they'd > use bgworkers.
+1. We could always get them now under the umbrella of the bgworker infrastructure if this cleans up some code duplication. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers