Re: To Tom Lane 2016-08-15 <20160815111057.v2mqqjp4aabvw...@msg.df7cb.de> > Re: Tom Lane 2016-07-30 <1184.1469890...@sss.pgh.pa.us> > > In short, I think that the way to make something like this work is to > > figure out how to have "virtual" catalog rows describing a temp table. > > Or maybe to partition the catalogs so that vacuuming away temp-table > > rows is easier/cheaper than today. > > We should also be thinking about how the opposite idea of "global" > temp tables
(Obviously I should catch up on the rest of the thread when postponing a message for an hour or two. Sorry for the duplicated idea here...) Christoph -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
