Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 5/12/16 6:14 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >> So what I've wanted to do for some time is invent a new expression node >> type that represents any one of these functions and can be reverse-listed >> in the same format that the input had. The attached proposed patch does >> that.
> I was experimenting with this as well when I found your patch, and I > think this is the right solution. Your patch works fine for me. Thanks for reviewing this patch. I've pushed it now. >> (I'm not particularly in love with the node type name >> ValueFunction; anybody got a better idea?) > I think this is fine. The only other idea I have would be > SQLValueFunction, to emphasize that this is about SQL-mandated special > cases. I went with SQLValueFunction. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers