Hi hackers,

To do something about the confusion I keep seeing about what exactly
"on" means, I've often wished we had "remote_flush".  But it's not
obvious how the backwards compatibility could work, ie how to keep the
people happy who use "local" vs "on" to control syncrep, and also the
people who use "off" vs "on" to control asynchronous commit on
single-node systems.  Is there any sensible way to do that, or is it
not broken and I should pipe down, or is it just far too entrenched
and never going to change?

Thomas Munro

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to