On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:
> I haven't looked at the patch, but offhand I wonder if it's worth
> considering control characters added by unicode, if you haven't already.

There is no need to put restrictions on those I think, and they are
actually supported. Look for example at pg_upgrade/test.sh, we are
already testing them with database names :) Not BEL of course, but
that works.
-- 
Michael


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to