Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> writes: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: >> There is no need to put restrictions on those I think, and they are >> actually supported.
> Bi-directional text support (i.e., the use of right-to-left control > characters) is known to have security implications, FWIW. There is an > interesting discussion of the matter here: > http://www.unicode.org/reports/tr36/#Bidirectional_Text_Spoofing The problem with implementing anything like that is that it requires assumptions about what encoding we're dealing with, which would be entirely not based in fact. (The DB encoding is not a good guide to what global names are encoded as, much less what encoding some shell might think it's using.) regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
