On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote:
> Well, the patch was updated several times, and the final version was not
> objected to until you objected.

It is not clear what you mean by "the final version", because you
posted two different final versions.  I don't see a clear vote from
anybody in favor of either of those things, and Peter's replies seem
to me to suggest that he does not support either of your proposals.
So I am not sure that I would agree with the statement that nobody
objected, but in any case there certainly wasn't a consensus in favor
of either change.

Also, the subject of this thread is "wrong suffix for pg_size_pretty",
which may not have tipped people off to the fact that you were
proposing to replace "kB" with "KB" everywhere.  Even after reading
your email, I didn't realize that you were proposing that until I
actually opened the patch and looked at it.  Such widespread changes
tend to draw objections, and IMHO shouldn't be made unless it's
abundantly clear that most people are in favor.

Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to