On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:50 PM, Greg Stark <st...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Aleksander Alekseev
> <a.aleks...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> Frankly I have much more faith in Tom's idea of using virtual part of the
>> catalog for all temporary tables, i.e turning all temporary tables into
>> "fast" temporary tables. Instead of introducing a new type of temporary 
>> tables
>> that solve catalog bloating problem and forcing users to rewrite applications
>> why not just not to create a problem in a first place?
> Would applications really need to be rewritten? Are they really
> constructing temporary tables where the definition of the table is
> dynamic, not just the content?

Mine is. But it wouldn't be a big deal to adapt.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to