* Bruce Momjian (br...@momjian.us) wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 11:39:29AM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: > > Now, one of the things discussed as well was that we may want to still > > keep pg_xlog, and soft-link to pg_journal or whatever-the-new-name is > > to not break the existing tools. Personally, I'd prefer a hard break. > > That would not be complicated to fix for any tool maintainers. > > I agree on a hard break, unless we get pushback from users, and even > then, they can create the symlinks themselves.
I'm in favor of the hard break generally, but I'd like David's input on it, to be sure we're not missing something. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature