On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 12:39 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > Maybe I'm missing something here - but why would we need to do any of > that? The WAL already isn't compatible between versions, and we don't > reuse the old server's WAL anyway? Isn't all that's needed relaxing some > error check?
Yeah. If this change is made in a new major version - and how else would we do it? - it doesn't introduce any incompatibility that wouldn't be present already. pg_upgrade doesn't (and can't) migrate WAL. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
