On 2016-08-29 12:07:51 -0400, David Steele wrote: > >> pg_replslot -> pg_tmp/pg_repslot > > > > That's most certainly not ephemeral. Just because something isn't > > generally appropriate on a standby, doesn't, by far, mean it's ephemeral. > > Yes, ephemeral was a poor choice of words. I really meant "can be > excluded from backups".
Then it most certainly can't be called pg_tmp, that'll just invite people to rm -rf it. And then they'll be screwed. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers