On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> writes: >> - bool single_copy; /* path must not be executed >1x */ >> + bool single_copy; /* path must not span on multiple >> processes */ > > I agree that the existing comment sucks, but this isn't a lot better > (and it will probably not look nice after pgindent gets done with it). > Possibly it's too complicated to jam a reasonable explanation into the > same-line comment, and what is needed is to expand the sentence about > it in the comment above the struct. > > Robert, could you fix the documentation for that field so it's > intelligible?
Uh, maybe. The trick, as you've already noted, is finding something better. Maybe this: - bool single_copy; /* path must not be executed >1x */ + bool single_copy; /* don't execute path in multiple processes */ -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers