On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: >> This looks good. > > Thanks for looking!
No problem. In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64 here, of course. -- Peter Geoghegan -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers