On August 31, 2016 3:06:23 PM PDT, Peter Geoghegan <p...@heroku.com> wrote:

>In other painfully pedantic news, I should point out that
>sizeof(size_t) isn't necessarily word size (the most generic
>definition of word size for the architecture), contrary to my reading
>of the 0002-* patch comments. I'm mostly talking thinking about x86_64
>here, of course.

Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to