Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2016-09-04 21:09:41 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Hm, couldn't we do that automatically? At least in the case where only >> one base-version script is available?
> You mean determining the baseversion? Hm, yes, that might work. But I'm > not sure how much we can rely on no earlier scripts being already > installed or such. Seems like a problem you'd possibly only encounter in > the field or dirty development environments. Actually, why would we care? Pick one, with some tiebreaker rules (shortest update path, for starters). I think nearly all of the infrastructure for this is already there in extension.c. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers