On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> On 06 Sep 2016, at 04:41, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This overlaps with TwoPhaseGetGXact but I'd rather keep both things
>> separated: it does not seem worth complicating the existing interface,
>> and putting that in cache during recovery has no meaning.
> Oh, I was preparing new version of patch, after fresh look on it. Probably, I 
> should
> said that in this topic. I’ve found a bug in sub transaction handling and now 
> working
> on fix.

What's the problem actually?

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to