> On 07 Sep 2016, at 03:09, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 06 Sep 2016, at 12:03, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:58 PM, Stas Kelvich <s.kelv...@postgrespro.ru> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Oh, I was preparing new version of patch, after fresh look on it. 
>>>> Probably, I should
>>>> said that in this topic. I’ve found a bug in sub transaction handling and 
>>>> now working
>>>> on fix.
>>> What's the problem actually?
>> Handling of xids_p array in PrescanPreparedTransactions() is wrong for 
>> prepared tx's in memory.
>> Also I want to double-check and add comments to RecoveryInProgress() checks 
>> in FinishGXact.
>> I’ll post reworked patch in several days.
> Could you use as a base the version I just sent yesterday then? I
> noticed many mistakes in the comments, for example many s/it's/its/
> and did a couple of adjustments around the code, the goto next_file
> was particularly ugly. That will be that much work not do to again
> later.

Yes. Already merged branch with your version.

Stas Kelvich
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to