On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> Don't you need to set proc->cvSleeping = false in ConditionVariableSignal? >>>> >>>> I poked at this a bit... OK, a lot... and have some feedback: >>>> >>>> 1. As above, we need to clear cvSleeping before setting the latch. >>> >>> Right, OK. >>> >> >> I have independently faced this problem while using your patch and for >> now I have updated my local copy. If possible, please send an updated >> patch as this patch could be used for development of various >> parallelism projects. > > Thomas already posted an updated patch in the same message where he > reported the problem. >
Oops, I missed that, will use the same. -- With Regards, Amit Kapila. EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
