On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Don't you need to set proc->cvSleeping = false in ConditionVariableSignal?
>>>> I poked at this a bit... OK, a lot... and have some feedback:
>>>> 1.  As above, we need to clear cvSleeping before setting the latch.
>>> Right, OK.
>> I have independently faced this problem while using your patch and for
>> now I have updated my local copy.  If possible, please send an updated
>> patch as this patch could be used for development of various
>> parallelism projects.
> Thomas already posted an updated patch in the same message where he
> reported the problem.

Oops, I missed that, will use the same.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to