On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 3:17 PM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:35 PM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> Don't you need to set proc->cvSleeping = false in ConditionVariableSignal? >>> >>> I poked at this a bit... OK, a lot... and have some feedback: >>> >>> 1. As above, we need to clear cvSleeping before setting the latch. >> >> Right, OK. >> > > I have independently faced this problem while using your patch and for > now I have updated my local copy. If possible, please send an updated > patch as this patch could be used for development of various > parallelism projects.
Thomas already posted an updated patch in the same message where he reported the problem. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers