On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:41 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Gavin Flower wrote: > >> possibly '--nosync' (& any similar) should have a '--no-sync' variation >> added, with the '--nosync' variation documented as depreciated? > > I agree -- I would go as far as just documenting --no-sync only and > keeping the --nosync one working with minimal (if any) visibility in > docs.
Keeping no visibility at all in the docs, with an alias in the binaries sounds fine to me if we want to standardize a bit more things. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
