On 2016-09-12 10:19:14 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > > > 0001-Add-some-more-targetlist-srf-tests.patch > > Add some test. > > I think you should go ahead and push this tests-adding patch now, as it > adds documentation of the current behavior that is a good thing to have > independently of what the rest of the patchset does. Also, I'm worried > that some of the GROUP BY tests might have machine-dependent results > (if they are implemented by hashing) so it would be good to get in a few > buildfarm cycles and let that settle out before we start changing the > answers.
Generally a sound plan - I started to noticeably expand it though, there's some important edge cases it didn't cover. > Although tsrf.sql doesn't currently need to create any views, it doesn't > seem like a great idea to assume that it never will. Maybe add this > after misc_functions in the previous parallel group, instead? WFM > +-- it's weird to GROUP BYs that increase the number of results > > "it's weird to have ..." > > +-- nonsensically that seems to be allowed > +UPDATE fewmore SET data = generate_series(4,9); > > "nonsense that seems to be allowed..." > > +-- SRFs are now allowed in RETURNING > +INSERT INTO fewmore VALUES(1) RETURNING generate_series(1,3); > > s/now/not/, apparently Err, yes. Will update. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers