Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> writes: > On September 13, 2016 9:07:35 AM PDT, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> I'd like to go ahead and push this, since it's a necessary prerequisite >> for either approach we might adopt for the rest of the patch series, >> and the improved error reporting and avoidance of expensive >> expression_returns_set searches make it a win IMO even if we were not >> planning to do anything more with SRFs.
> Can't look are the code just now, on my way to the airport for pgopen, but > the idea sounds good to me. OK, I went ahead and pushed it. We can tweak later if needed. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers