On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wonder why you have included a new file for these tests, why can't be
these added to existing hash_index.sql.
tests in hash_index.sql did not cover overflow pages, above tests were for
mainly for them. So I thought having a separate test file can help
enabling/disabling them in schedule files, when we do not want them running
as it take slightly high time. If you think otherwise I will reconsider
will add tests to hash_index.sql.

>The relation name con_hash_index* choosen in above tests doesn't seem to
be appropriate, how about hash_split_heap* or something like that.
Fixed. Have renamed relation, index and test filename accordingly.

Thanks and Regards
Mithun C Y
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: commit-hash_coverage_test_v2_no_wal.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to