Great, given it does not apply to this patch, then all the other tests
passed and the change looks good.

Thank you,

On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:27 AM Tom Lane <> wrote:

> Enrique Meneses <> writes:
> > I was not sure what "Spec compliant means"... so I did not select as
> tested or passed. What should I do to validate that this change is "Spec
> compliant"?
> It's irrelevant to this patch, AFAICS.  The SQL standard doesn't discuss
> indexes at all, much less legislate on which operator classes ought to
> exist for GIN indexes.
>                         regards, tom lane

Reply via email to