Great, given it does not apply to this patch, then all the other tests passed and the change looks good.
Thank you, Enrique On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 6:27 AM Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Enrique Meneses <emmene...@gmail.com> writes: > > I was not sure what "Spec compliant means"... so I did not select as > tested or passed. What should I do to validate that this change is "Spec > compliant"? > > It's irrelevant to this patch, AFAICS. The SQL standard doesn't discuss > indexes at all, much less legislate on which operator classes ought to > exist for GIN indexes. > > regards, tom lane >