Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> OK, I'll think about how to do that more efficiently. The smaller >> incremental improvement isn't surprising, because in this example the >> index would still be 90-something MB if it had no free space at all, >> so there's going to be decreasing returns from any additional work >> to avoid wasted free space. But if we can do it cheaply, this does >> suggest that using pages in order by free space is of value.
> Tom, are you planning to do something about this patch yet this > CommitFest, or leave it until later? I doubt I will get to it this week, so let's mark it RWF for this fest. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers