On 2016-10-01 20:04:18 +0100, Greg Stark wrote: > On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote: > > > > Unfortunately I'm running out battery right now, so I don't want to > > re-run the benchmarks posted upthread (loading takes a while). But the > > last time I ran them all the results after the patches were better than > > before.
> I have a machine sitting idle now too if you have specific ideas of > what to benchmark. Last time I just extracted interesting parts of queries from tpc-h (to be able to look at bitmapscans/hash-aggs in isolation) and ran tpc-h as a whole. During development I also tried to come up with adverse cases (e.g. huge bitmapscans, with very low work_mem). I don't really have a lot better ideas than that. Andres -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
