At Mon, 3 Oct 2016 13:14:23 +0900, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote in <cab7npqsf8dbndokt5der6fpzdusuxn_g7uwnpqun_a_sewb...@mail.gmail.com> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI > <horiguchi.kyot...@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > > Sorry for no response, but, the answer is yes. We could be able > > to avoid the problem by managing execution state for every > > node. But it needs an additional flag in *State structs and > > manipulating on the way shuttling up and down around the > > execution tree. > > Moved to next CF.
Thank you. -- Kyotaro Horiguchi NTT Open Source Software Center -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
