On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote: > Wouldn't pgbench benefit from it? > It was mentioned some time ago [1], in relationship to the > \into construct, how client-server latency was important enough to > justify the use of a "\;" separator between statements, to send them > as a group. > > But with the libpq batch API, maybe this could be modernized > with meta-commands like this: > \startbatch > ... > \endbatch
Or just \batch [on|off], which sounds like a damn good idea to me for some users willing to test some workloads before integrating it in an application. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
