On 04/10/16 20:15, Michael Paquier wrote:
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Verite <dan...@manitou-mail.org> wrote:
Wouldn't pgbench benefit from it?
It was mentioned some time ago [1], in relationship to the
\into construct, how client-server latency was important enough to
justify the use of a "\;" separator between statements, to send them
as a group.
But with the libpq batch API, maybe this could be modernized
with meta-commands like this:
\startbatch
...
\endbatch
Or just \batch [on|off], which sounds like a damn good idea to me for
some users willing to test some workloads before integrating it in an
application.
+1
'\batch' is a bit easier, to find, & to remember than '\startbatch'
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
