On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:05 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Michael Paquier > <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There was something like 60~70 patches still listed as active in the > > CF app on Friday my time, so doing the vacuum cleanup has taken some > > time by marking patches as returned with feedback, rejected (few) and > > moved to next CF. A couple of things I noted when going through the > > remaining entries: > > - a lot of folks have registered to review a patch and did not post a > > review. Please avoid putting your name on a patch if you can't afford > > the time to look at a patch. > > - The rule one patch sent = one patch review of equal difficulty still works. > > - Be careful of the status of the patch, and update it correctly. I > > have noticed a lot of improvements in this area actually! > > Forgot something: if you feel that your patch did not receive the > correct treatment, of course feel free to update its status in the CF > app, feel free as well to complain at me and/or on this thread if > necessary. I am sure we will be able to sort things out :)
Hi Michael, Thank you so much for your help. I was travelling to take a rest after a long and busy month. I'll update my statistics and send another email to check the % of the work was done. Thanks again, -- Fabrízio de Royes Mello Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL >> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br >> Blog: http://fabriziomello.github.io >> Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello >> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello >> Github: http://github.com/fabriziomello
