[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I don't agree with this: XML and XHTML are two different things.
No one claimed anything to the contrary. > We could certainly upgrade the HTML portion, but I am pretty sure that > the XML standard calls for this format: > > <columnname>data here</columnname> The XML standard does not call for any table format. But a number of table formats have been established within the XML framework. Some of them are formatting-oriented (e.g., the HTML model, or CALS which is used in DocBook) and some of them are processing-oriented (e.g., SQL/XML). Which do we need? And which do we need from psql in particular (keeping in mind that psql is primarily for interactive use and shell-scripting)? In any case, it should most likely be a standard table model and not a hand-crafted one. (If, for whatever reason, we go the "processing-oriented" route, then I claim that there should not be a different output with and without \x mode.) -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
