2016-10-12 19:48 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com>:
> On 10/12/16 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > I'm not sure that Peter was voting for retaining "internal name", but > > personally I prefer that to deleting prosrc entirely, so +1. > > I'm not sure what the point of showing the internal name would be if we > have already declared that the source code of non-C functions is not > that interesting. But I don't have a strong feeling about it. > The benefit is for people who have to look on C implementation of internal functions. Probably not too big group - but it can be interesting for beginners who starting with reading of PostgreSQL code. Regards Pavel > > -- > Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ > PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services >
