2016-10-12 19:48 GMT+02:00 Peter Eisentraut <
> On 10/12/16 11:16 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I'm not sure that Peter was voting for retaining "internal name", but
> > personally I prefer that to deleting prosrc entirely, so +1.
> I'm not sure what the point of showing the internal name would be if we
> have already declared that the source code of non-C functions is not
> that interesting. But I don't have a strong feeling about it.
The benefit is for people who have to look on C implementation of internal
functions. Probably not too big group - but it can be interesting for
beginners who starting with reading of PostgreSQL code.
> Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services