On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote: > There is major chance in tidbitmap.c file after efficient hash table > commit  and my patch need to be rebased. > > Only parallel-bitmap-heap-scan need to be rebased, all other patch can > be applied on head as is. > Rebased version (v2) of parallel-bitmap-heap-scan is attached.
But what's the impact on performance? Presumably parallel bitmap heap scan was already slower than the non-parallel version, and that commit presumably widens the gap. Seems like something to worry about... -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers