On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 1:23 AM, Dilip Kumar <dilipbal...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There is major chance in tidbitmap.c file after efficient hash table
> commit  and my patch need to be rebased.
> Only parallel-bitmap-heap-scan need to be rebased, all other patch can
> be applied on head as is.
> Rebased version (v2) of parallel-bitmap-heap-scan is attached.
But what's the impact on performance? Presumably parallel bitmap heap
scan was already slower than the non-parallel version, and that commit
presumably widens the gap. Seems like something to worry about...
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org)
To make changes to your subscription: