Craig Ringer <cr...@2ndquadrant.com> writes: > On 18 October 2016 at 04:11, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> As for the core problem, I wonder why we aren't recommending that >> third-party modules be built using the same infrastructure contrib >> uses, rather than people ginning up their own infrastructure and >> then finding out the hard way that that means they need PGDLLEXPORT >> marks.
> Effectively, "PGXS for Windows". Yeah. > I've kind of been hoping the CMake work would make the whole mess of > Perl build stuff go away. CMake would solve this quite neatly since we > can bundle CMake parameters file for inclusion in other projects and > could also tell pg_config how to point to it. Extensions then become > trivial CMake projects. Agreed, it'd be wise not to put any effort into that until we see whether the CMake conversion succeeds. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers