Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> As for the core problem, I wonder why we aren't recommending that >> third-party modules be built using the same infrastructure contrib >> uses, rather than people ginning up their own infrastructure and >> then finding out the hard way that that means they need PGDLLEXPORT >> marks.
> So, they'd need to generate export files somehow? My point is that that's a solved problem. Perhaps the issue is that we haven't made our src/tools/msvc infrastructure available for outside use in the way that we've exported our Unix build infrastructure through PGXS. But if so, I should think that working on that is the thing to do. [ wanders away wondering what cmake does with this... ] regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers