Tom, * Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote: > Jim Nasby <jim.na...@bluetreble.com> writes: > > A customer just pinged me wondering how it was that a BitmapAnd node was > > reporting 0 tuples when the Bitmap Heap Scan above it showed it had in > > fact generated tuples. > > > While this is mentioned in the docs, I think it would be very helpful to > > have ANALYZE spit out "N/A" instead of 0 for these nodes. > > That would break code that tries to parse that stuff, eg depesz.com.
I don't believe Jim was suggesting that we back-patch such a change. Changing it in a new major release seems entirely reasonable. Thanks! Stephen
Description: Digital signature