David Steele wrote: > On 10/21/16 3:12 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: > > > I have no problem continuing keeping with historical precedent and > > allowing mnemonic abbreviations in our directory and file names at this > > point. > > I'm still in favor of pg_xact. A search of the 9.6 docs brings up a number > of hits for "xact": pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp(), > pg_advisory_xact_lock(), pg_advisory_xact_lock_shared(), > pg_last_committed_xact(), pg_prepared_xacts(), etc. There are also numerous > column names that have "xact" in them.
I'm +1 on pg_clog -> pg_xact. Also +1 to renaming pg_subtrans to pg_subxact. In general, +1 to short mnemonic meaningful names. -1 to overly long names, -1 to meaningless names. Regarding pg_receivexlog I think I'd propose pg_recvwal rather than pg_receivewal, because of pg_recvlogical. -- Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
