On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 4:29 AM, Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > David Steele wrote: >> On 10/21/16 3:12 AM, David G. Johnston wrote: >> >> > I have no problem continuing keeping with historical precedent and >> > allowing mnemonic abbreviations in our directory and file names at this >> > point. >> >> I'm still in favor of pg_xact. A search of the 9.6 docs brings up a number >> of hits for "xact": pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp(), >> pg_advisory_xact_lock(), pg_advisory_xact_lock_shared(), >> pg_last_committed_xact(), pg_prepared_xacts(), etc. There are also numerous >> column names that have "xact" in them. > > I'm +1 on pg_clog -> pg_xact.
So let's say that's the winner then. > Also +1 to renaming pg_subtrans to pg_subxact. Nice suggestion, good naming for consistency with the rest. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
