On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Andres Freund <and...@anarazel.de> wrote:
> On 2016-09-23 16:04:32 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Looking back over the thread, I see that you also proposed installing
>> isolationtester and pg_isolation_regress for the benefit of extensions.
>> I'm very much less excited about that idea.  It'd be substantially more
>> dead weight in typical installations, and I'm not sure that it'd be useful
>> to common extensions, and I'm not eager to treat isolationtester's API
>> and behavior as something we need to hold stable for extension use.
> FWIW, I'd be quite happy if it were installed. Running isolationtester
> when compiling extensions against distribution postgres packages would
> be quite useful.


Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to