On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:52 AM, Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Amit, can you please split the buffer manager changes in this patch
>>> into a separate patch?
>> Sure, attached patch extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v1.patch does that.
> The additional argument to ConditionalLockBuffer() doesn't seem to be
> used anywhere in the main patch.  Do we actually need it?

No, with latest patch of concurrent hash index, we don't need it.  I
have forgot to remove it.  Please find updated patch attached.  The
usage of second parameter for ConditionalLockBuffer() is removed as we
don't want to allow I/O across content locks, so the patch is changed
to fallback to twice locking the metapage.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

Attachment: extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v2.patch
Description: Binary data

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to