On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 10:30 AM, Amit Kapila <amit.kapil...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Amit, can you please split the buffer manager changes in this patch >> into a separate patch? > > Sure, attached patch extend_bufmgr_api_for_hash_index_v1.patch does that.
The additional argument to ConditionalLockBuffer() doesn't seem to be used anywhere in the main patch. Do we actually need it? -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers