On 10/24/16 9:22 AM, Petr Jelinek wrote: > I also split out the libpqwalreceiver rewrite to separate patch which > does just the re-architecture and does not really add new functionality. > And I did the re-architecture bit differently based on the review.
That looks good to me, and it appears to address the previous discussions. I wouldn't change walrcv_xxx to walrcvconn_xxx. If we're going to have macros to hide the internals, we might as well keep the names the same. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers