On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote: > Either the comment is wrongly written or the check for overflow > condition has to be fixed. Assuming the overflow check condition to be > erroneous, I've attached a patch to fix this.
Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (firstname.lastname@example.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers