On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Either the comment is wrongly written or the check for overflow
> condition has to be fixed. Assuming the overflow check condition to be
> erroneous, I've attached a patch to fix this.

Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823.

Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:

Reply via email to