On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <[email protected]> wrote: > Either the comment is wrongly written or the check for overflow > condition has to be fixed. Assuming the overflow check condition to be > erroneous, I've attached a patch to fix this.
Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823. -- Michael -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
