On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Markus Nullmeier <dq...@uni-heidelberg.de> wrote: > On 11/08/16 18:12, Robert Haas wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:01 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paqu...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 2:33 PM, Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh.2...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> I've attached a patch to fix this. >>> Good catch. Interesting copy-pasto from 88e9823. >> Committed. > > Hmm, somehow this fix (60379f66c8 for master) does not seem to appear > in the 9.5 and 9.6 branches, yet the latter both include commit 88e9823.
It didn't seem important to back-patch it, so I didn't. It also occurred to me that there was a small chance of breaking the build for somebody who is skating by today, which would annoy that person without being likely to benefit anyone else. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
