On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 1:28 PM, David Steele <da...@pgmasters.net> wrote:

> Hi Magnus,
> On 11/7/16 2:07 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:12 PM, Michael Paquier
>>     Indeed, giving the attached for REL9_6_STABLE. You could as well have
>>     a test for pg_stat_tmp but honestly that's not worth it. One thing I
>>     have noticed is that the patch does not use _tarWriteDir() for
>>     pg_xlog. I think it should even if that's not addressing directly a
>>     bug...
>> Applied and backported, thanks. Backported to 9.4, as this is where that
>> exclusion code appeared.
> I reviewed the three back-patches and they look sensible to me.


> I did not backport the tests, as we don't have the $node stuff available
>> in 9.5 and earlier.
> That's unfortunate but the changes are pretty straightforward and the
> testing is as good as it was before...

Yeah, that's my thinking as well. It would be nice, but not worth the

 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

Reply via email to