On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Peter Eisentraut
> On 11/17/16 12:30 AM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki wrote:
>> No, I'm not recommending a higher value, but just removing the doubtful
>> sentences of 512MB upper limit. The advantage is that eliminating this
>> sentence will make a chance for users to try best setting.
> I think this is a good point. The information is clearly
> wrong/outdated. We have no new better information, but we should remove
> misleading outdated advice and let users find new advice. Basically,
> this just puts Windows on par with other platforms with regard to
> shared_buffers tuning, doesn't it?
> I'm inclined to commit the original patch if there are no objections.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (email@example.com)
To make changes to your subscription: