On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 5:29 AM, David Rowley <david.row...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > There's 11 functions which are marked immutable, but are marked as > parallel unsafe. > > postgres=# select proname from pg_proc where provolatile = 'i' and > proparallel = 'u'; > proname > ----------------------------- > _pg_expandarray > _pg_keysequal > _pg_truetypid > _pg_truetypmod > _pg_char_max_length > _pg_char_octet_length > _pg_numeric_precision > _pg_numeric_precision_radix > _pg_numeric_scale > _pg_datetime_precision > _pg_interval_type > (11 rows) > > I'm finding hard to imagine a reason why these might be unsafe, but > failed. I do notice they're all only used in information_schema. > > Could it just perhaps be that these just missed the verification > process the other functions went through to determine their parallel > safety?
Yes, I think that's it. I went through pg_proc.h, but never looked at information_schema.sql. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
